Posted 05 July 2007 - 06:21 AM
will Sam and David ever break up?
Page 1 of 1
will sam and david ever break up?? i mean they had IT twice won't david want to have IT with more th
MultiQuote
#11
Posted 31 July 2007 - 09:07 PM
Here's what I think: Since David will be going to college and Sam is still in high school I would predict a very rocky relationship because of the strain college will put in their relationship but because we all know how perfect they are together, they'll probably get through it all, the ups and the downs, and hang on to their status as the perfect couple for a long, long time and live happily ever after... :love7: The End.
Posted 03 August 2007 - 02:15 PM
#16
Posted 11 September 2007 - 01:53 PM
cant_get_enough, on Aug 29 2007, 06:23 PM, said:
It's weird- I never really think about the futures' of Meg Cabot couples. I just see the happily ever after endings and stay happy. However, I think Sam and David would stay together for quite a long time, but who knows what could happen. :D
Rebecca
Rebecca
since i posted this in the beginning i think david will break up with sam u know so he can have it with other girls it is so like boys to do that!!!
#18
Posted 23 September 2007 - 11:49 AM
i really think they'll stay together but Meg is goning to write a new book because when you look at the books in the site it says "ABOUT THE BOOK" and she hasn't done that with All american girl!!!! so don't worry there will be a new book probably next year (i hope)!!! ok tell me whether you think this is true and show me your evidence ok??!!!
#20
Posted 23 September 2007 - 04:58 PM
They had it twice? Twice? I know they did it in RON at Camp David and at the ending they implied that they were going to do it this weekend but other things might come up or they just might be uncomfortable doing it again. Sorry, I just had to say\ask that.
#22
Posted 29 September 2007 - 12:12 PM
Quote
They had it twice? Twice? I know they did it in RON at Camp David and at the ending they implied that they were going to do it this weekend but other things might come up or they just might be uncomfortable doing it again. Sorry, I just had to say\ask that.
Thats up for you to decide. We know they did it at camp david. Its up for you to decide if they do it again at the White House.
-Gina
#24
Posted 06 October 2007 - 12:56 PM
izzie, on Sep 29 2007, 04:56 PM, said:
ok but i know there will be a new book because i mean there just HAS to be you can't just leave it at them having sex i mean what about Jess and Rob they had it but there was still some of the book left
Meg said she wasn't doing another AAG book, heck, she didn't even want to do a second one but she had so many letters begging her to!
I always thought that Sam and David would stay together, but my friend just broke up with her boyfriend of more than a year because the spark ran out. Maybe that'll happen to Sam and Dave?
#25
Posted 27 October 2007 - 08:11 PM
wait, first question..
sam and david have Done It twice??!??!!?!! i thought it was just once in Camp david???!!! :o
and really??!! there's not gonna be another AAG book? :( the first one was the best and would have been fine without a sequel but ready or not needs to have a next book! its too hanging..in a way. haha.:D
and i don't think they'll break up. once you've Done It, they say, the girl hangs tight. and David really loves Sam. :)
sam and david have Done It twice??!??!!?!! i thought it was just once in Camp david???!!! :o
and really??!! there's not gonna be another AAG book? :( the first one was the best and would have been fine without a sequel but ready or not needs to have a next book! its too hanging..in a way. haha.:D
and i don't think they'll break up. once you've Done It, they say, the girl hangs tight. and David really loves Sam. :)
#26
Posted 13 November 2007 - 12:08 PM
Yes but even nice gys like David can b heartbreakers and think about it a guy would want to do *IT* with other girls you know to see whether they are better or maybe not it's that boys here are a bit stupid and tend to do these things and i got thinkuing about David you know if he's like that but maybe maybe, not
Izzie -xXx-
Izzie -xXx-
Posted 17 November 2007 - 10:29 AM
#28
Posted 17 November 2007 - 10:36 AM
babyblue_princess93, on Jul 24 2007, 05:38 AM, said:
are you crazy they are like the perfect couple
-steph
-steph
I should have done this ages ago when you first posted this but NO I AM NOT CRAZY OK AND YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO CALL ME THAT AND WHY DON'T THE MODS (NINA.CSI) TELL YOU LIKE SHE TOLD ME FOR SAYING "ARE YOU BLIND?"
Izzie(not crazy)
#31
Posted 25 November 2007 - 02:03 PM
Quote
Um, well, actually, they've NEVER Done It. Where did you get THAT idea? In RoN, Sam THINKS david wants to Do It, but he really doesn't! Sorry!
Quote
They had it twice? Twice? I know they did it in RON at Camp David and at the ending they implied that they were going to do it this weekend but other things might come up or they just might be uncomfortable doing it again. Sorry, I just had to say\ask that.
They had it once, at Camp David. Remember the conversations with Lucy and Dauntra, writeaholic? And it was implied that they'd do it again at the White House that weekend, but we can't be sure.
Oh, and I imagine that they stay together forever. They're the perfect couple.
-Katie :badgrin:
#33
Posted 04 January 2008 - 08:37 PM
Hmm...most people in real life after they do it they stop going out because that's all the person wanted or they stay together. :mad: Honestly I'm dissipionted in Sam she should have waited, and got married frist. :doubt: So I'm thinking they're staying together, but if it were to be a little more realistic they might break-up. :icon_study: Well, I don'ts knows! :doubt: :mgbubblegum:
Man this is such a drag. :user:
Man this is such a drag. :user:
#34
Posted 28 January 2008 - 09:05 PM
Quote
since i posted this in the beginning i think david will break up with sam u know so he can have it with other girls it is so like boys to do that!!!
I had sex with my boyfriend a month and five days after meeting. And we got up to... stuff the first night we met. Does that mean that I was just a casual fling, because we had sex so soon, I didn't make him wait?
Does it mean he wants to sleep with other girls?
Uh, no. We've been together almost two years, seven months now. HE is actually more old fashioned in his views about sex than I am.
Quote
Honestly I'm dissipionted in Sam she should have waited, and got married frist. So I'm thinking they're staying together, but if it were to be a little more realistic they might break-up
I think my above point also serves to illustrate this.
I think with Sam's views, it's unrealistic to expect her to wait til marriage. Frankly, I don't believe that waiting for marriage is a good basis for a relationship- marriage is no longer the social necessity it once was, given the secularisation of Western culture and the rise in cohabitation. I believe it's a good idea to see how you are sexually compatable- you may not realise it, but sex is a huge part of a relationship- it can be a huge expression of love (scientific studies have shown that many men express love through actions, including sex, whilst many women recieve dopamine emmissions which cause a sense of bonding). Not to mention that I think it's wisest to cohabit before marriage. Not only to see how compatable you are, but the two events- marriage and moving in with a partner- are deeply stressful, so spacing them out is probably best for your sanity!
I can see the two staying together, maybe with some issues arising because they are both strong willed people who may well clash. But, they love each other and both have shown a willingness to make sacrifices and give to the other, so they stand a fair chance on making it.
Can we please make judgements based on character?
(feel free to debate me on this :P )
#35
Posted 29 January 2008 - 03:54 PM
Quote
I think my above point also serves to illustrate this.
I think with Sam's views, it's unrealistic to expect her to wait til marriage. Frankly, I don't believe that waiting for marriage is a good basis for a relationship- marriage is no longer the social necessity it once was, given the secularisation of Western culture and the rise in cohabitation. I believe it's a good idea to see how you are sexually compatable- you may not realise it, but sex is a huge part of a relationship- it can be a huge expression of love (scientific studies have shown that many men express love through actions, including sex, whilst many women recieve dopamine emmissions which cause a sense of bonding). Not to mention that I think it's wisest to cohabit before marriage. Not only to see how compatable you are, but the two events- marriage and moving in with a partner- are deeply stressful, so spacing them out is probably best for your sanity!
I can see the two staying together, maybe with some issues arising because they are both strong willed people who may well clash. But, they love each other and both have shown a willingness to make sacrifices and give to the other, so they stand a fair chance on making it.
Can we please make judgements based on character?
(feel free to debate me on this )
I think with Sam's views, it's unrealistic to expect her to wait til marriage. Frankly, I don't believe that waiting for marriage is a good basis for a relationship- marriage is no longer the social necessity it once was, given the secularisation of Western culture and the rise in cohabitation. I believe it's a good idea to see how you are sexually compatable- you may not realise it, but sex is a huge part of a relationship- it can be a huge expression of love (scientific studies have shown that many men express love through actions, including sex, whilst many women recieve dopamine emmissions which cause a sense of bonding). Not to mention that I think it's wisest to cohabit before marriage. Not only to see how compatable you are, but the two events- marriage and moving in with a partner- are deeply stressful, so spacing them out is probably best for your sanity!
I can see the two staying together, maybe with some issues arising because they are both strong willed people who may well clash. But, they love each other and both have shown a willingness to make sacrifices and give to the other, so they stand a fair chance on making it.
Can we please make judgements based on character?
(feel free to debate me on this )
I agree, but I'm really, really religions (Sorry if I didn't spell that right) so I would have liked them to wait, because that what God wants (Sorry for getting all God-like)!!
#36
Posted 29 January 2008 - 04:30 PM
^I agree with imanginary roses. (Sorry, don't know your real name)
I believe that it is fine if you chose to wait until marriage because of religion, for yourself. Not everyone has the same beliefs as you. Sam obviously did what was right for her. Like I said, if you want to wait: Fine. I would never try to change your mind. But, others are not as religious as you, and choose to do things a little differently. You say that's what God wants, but do we know how Samantha feels about religion? It is never stated in the book.
Before I make this next statement, remember: I have nothing against waiting until marriage for religious, moral, or social reasons. But, as Samantha's story shows, in this day and age, it is possible to have safe, responsible sex before marriage with no problems. I don't think what she and David did was wrong, it was very safe and completely legal. Maybe its not what you would choose, but its what Samantha did.
Just out of curiosity, All-American Girl and Divalectable, if you and Samantha were good friends in real life, and you knew what happened, would you treat her differently? Would you still hang out with her?
-Katie :badgrin:
I believe that it is fine if you chose to wait until marriage because of religion, for yourself. Not everyone has the same beliefs as you. Sam obviously did what was right for her. Like I said, if you want to wait: Fine. I would never try to change your mind. But, others are not as religious as you, and choose to do things a little differently. You say that's what God wants, but do we know how Samantha feels about religion? It is never stated in the book.
Before I make this next statement, remember: I have nothing against waiting until marriage for religious, moral, or social reasons. But, as Samantha's story shows, in this day and age, it is possible to have safe, responsible sex before marriage with no problems. I don't think what she and David did was wrong, it was very safe and completely legal. Maybe its not what you would choose, but its what Samantha did.
Just out of curiosity, All-American Girl and Divalectable, if you and Samantha were good friends in real life, and you knew what happened, would you treat her differently? Would you still hang out with her?
-Katie :badgrin:
#37
Posted 29 January 2008 - 05:09 PM
imaginary roses, on Jan 28 2008, 09:05 PM, said:
Actually, that's a gross generalisation. He loves her, I can't see him ditching her just to get his end away.
I had sex with my boyfriend a month and five days after meeting. And we got up to... stuff the first night we met. Does that mean that I was just a casual fling, because we had sex so soon, I didn't make him wait?
Does it mean he wants to sleep with other girls?
Uh, no. We've been together almost two years, seven months now. HE is actually more old fashioned in his views about sex than I am.
I think my above point also serves to illustrate this.
I think with Sam's views, it's unrealistic to expect her to wait til marriage. Frankly, I don't believe that waiting for marriage is a good basis for a relationship- marriage is no longer the social necessity it once was, given the secularisation of Western culture and the rise in cohabitation. I believe it's a good idea to see how you are sexually compatable- you may not realise it, but sex is a huge part of a relationship- it can be a huge expression of love (scientific studies have shown that many men express love through actions, including sex, whilst many women recieve dopamine emmissions which cause a sense of bonding). Not to mention that I think it's wisest to cohabit before marriage. Not only to see how compatable you are, but the two events- marriage and moving in with a partner- are deeply stressful, so spacing them out is probably best for your sanity!
I can see the two staying together, maybe with some issues arising because they are both strong willed people who may well clash. But, they love each other and both have shown a willingness to make sacrifices and give to the other, so they stand a fair chance on making it.
Can we please make judgements based on character?
(feel free to debate me on this :P )
I had sex with my boyfriend a month and five days after meeting. And we got up to... stuff the first night we met. Does that mean that I was just a casual fling, because we had sex so soon, I didn't make him wait?
Does it mean he wants to sleep with other girls?
Uh, no. We've been together almost two years, seven months now. HE is actually more old fashioned in his views about sex than I am.
I think my above point also serves to illustrate this.
I think with Sam's views, it's unrealistic to expect her to wait til marriage. Frankly, I don't believe that waiting for marriage is a good basis for a relationship- marriage is no longer the social necessity it once was, given the secularisation of Western culture and the rise in cohabitation. I believe it's a good idea to see how you are sexually compatable- you may not realise it, but sex is a huge part of a relationship- it can be a huge expression of love (scientific studies have shown that many men express love through actions, including sex, whilst many women recieve dopamine emmissions which cause a sense of bonding). Not to mention that I think it's wisest to cohabit before marriage. Not only to see how compatable you are, but the two events- marriage and moving in with a partner- are deeply stressful, so spacing them out is probably best for your sanity!
I can see the two staying together, maybe with some issues arising because they are both strong willed people who may well clash. But, they love each other and both have shown a willingness to make sacrifices and give to the other, so they stand a fair chance on making it.
Can we please make judgements based on character?
(feel free to debate me on this :P )
If feel strongly about waiting because I have a friend that's in high school, and has had many boyfriends that said they loved her so she got into bed with them...after that they broke up with her, and made a web-site about her, and everything she did with them :doubt: ...honestly that was horrible! All of her old boyfriends banded together to do that to her. It makes me sick! :mad:
Sorry, that's my reasons for thinking Sam should have waited. :neutral:
Luv, Diva :spinstar:
Man this is such a drag. :user:
#38
Posted 29 January 2008 - 08:49 PM
God, that's terrible. But I highly doubt David would do that. I don't believe you have to sleep with someone to love them and vice versa. But if you're ready, I see no reason to be bound by marriage. I actually think Meg was giving a good message by showing teen sex portrayed in a committed relationship and with contraception. She's also balanced this in PD, showing both choices as equally valid
#39
Posted 01 February 2008 - 05:18 PM
Quote
^I agree with imanginary roses. (Sorry, don't know your real name)
I believe that it is fine if you chose to wait until marriage because of religion, for yourself. Not everyone has the same beliefs as you. Sam obviously did what was right for her. Like I said, if you want to wait: Fine. I would never try to change your mind. But, others are not as religious as you, and choose to do things a little differently. You say that's what God wants, but do we know how Samantha feels about religion? It is never stated in the book.
Before I make this next statement, remember: I have nothing against waiting until marriage for religious, moral, or social reasons. But, as Samantha's story shows, in this day and age, it is possible to have safe, responsible sex before marriage with no problems. I don't think what she and David did was wrong, it was very safe and completely legal. Maybe its not what you would choose, but its what Samantha did.
Just out of curiosity, All-American Girl and Divalectable, if you and Samantha were good friends in real life, and you knew what happened, would you treat her differently? Would you still hang out with her?
-Katie
I believe that it is fine if you chose to wait until marriage because of religion, for yourself. Not everyone has the same beliefs as you. Sam obviously did what was right for her. Like I said, if you want to wait: Fine. I would never try to change your mind. But, others are not as religious as you, and choose to do things a little differently. You say that's what God wants, but do we know how Samantha feels about religion? It is never stated in the book.
Before I make this next statement, remember: I have nothing against waiting until marriage for religious, moral, or social reasons. But, as Samantha's story shows, in this day and age, it is possible to have safe, responsible sex before marriage with no problems. I don't think what she and David did was wrong, it was very safe and completely legal. Maybe its not what you would choose, but its what Samantha did.
Just out of curiosity, All-American Girl and Divalectable, if you and Samantha were good friends in real life, and you knew what happened, would you treat her differently? Would you still hang out with her?
-Katie
I wouldn't treat her any differently. I would kinda look up to her in a way!! I didn't mean my reply to sound cross earlier...SORRY! I was just stating my thought on the matter...
#40
Posted 01 February 2008 - 05:51 PM
hehe, no fears. I pose these questions not to trap people or bring them round to my views, but to engage in discussion. So long as my right to my own opinion is respected, I have no issue with whatever others believe. I'll only get annoyed if people try telling me I'm going to hell for what I believe or have done. I actually really admire people who wait til marriage- not because I wish I had, or whatever, but because in this day and age, it must be so hard and I admire anyone with the convictions of their beliefs (to a degree, so long as it inflicts no harm on others). Let me live
my life, I'll let you live yours- but that's no reason not to try and understand why we've made the choices we have.
~Lex
("imaginary roses" comes from one of my favourite poems, "Flowers" by Wendy Cope, which is one of the reasons my (admittedly dreadful) attempts at playing hard to get fell though when I first met my now-boyfriend)
PS. I'd like to point out, just to keep things in perspective (ie. I'm NOT trying to lead young things astray) that I'm almost 20. My choices now were certainly not the right ones for a younger me, but they are for who I am now
my life, I'll let you live yours- but that's no reason not to try and understand why we've made the choices we have.
~Lex
("imaginary roses" comes from one of my favourite poems, "Flowers" by Wendy Cope, which is one of the reasons my (admittedly dreadful) attempts at playing hard to get fell though when I first met my now-boyfriend)
PS. I'd like to point out, just to keep things in perspective (ie. I'm NOT trying to lead young things astray) that I'm almost 20. My choices now were certainly not the right ones for a younger me, but they are for who I am now
#41
Posted 01 February 2008 - 09:09 PM
Quote
I wouldn't treat her any differently. I would kinda look up to her in a way!! I didn't mean my reply to sound cross earlier...SORRY! I was just stating my thought on the matter...
Its okay. :) I don't think you sounded cross. I was just curious. I don't really have a religion, so I was just interested in seeing what a religious POV would think.
-Katie :badgrin:
#42
Posted 10 February 2008 - 09:18 AM
balletlover, on Jan 29 2008, 04:30 PM, said:
^I agree with imanginary roses. (Sorry, don't know your real name)
I believe that it is fine if you chose to wait until marriage because of religion, for yourself. Not everyone has the same beliefs as you. Sam obviously did what was right for her. Like I said, if you want to wait: Fine. I would never try to change your mind. But, others are not as religious as you, and choose to do things a little differently. You say that's what God wants, but do we know how Samantha feels about religion? It is never stated in the book.
Before I make this next statement, remember: I have nothing against waiting until marriage for religious, moral, or social reasons. But, as Samantha's story shows, in this day and age, it is possible to have safe, responsible sex before marriage with no problems. I don't think what she and David did was wrong, it was very safe and completely legal. Maybe its not what you would choose, but its what Samantha did.
Just out of curiosity, All-American Girl and Divalectable, if you and Samantha were good friends in real life, and you knew what happened, would you treat her differently? Would you still hang out with her?
-Katie :badgrin:
I believe that it is fine if you chose to wait until marriage because of religion, for yourself. Not everyone has the same beliefs as you. Sam obviously did what was right for her. Like I said, if you want to wait: Fine. I would never try to change your mind. But, others are not as religious as you, and choose to do things a little differently. You say that's what God wants, but do we know how Samantha feels about religion? It is never stated in the book.
Before I make this next statement, remember: I have nothing against waiting until marriage for religious, moral, or social reasons. But, as Samantha's story shows, in this day and age, it is possible to have safe, responsible sex before marriage with no problems. I don't think what she and David did was wrong, it was very safe and completely legal. Maybe its not what you would choose, but its what Samantha did.
Just out of curiosity, All-American Girl and Divalectable, if you and Samantha were good friends in real life, and you knew what happened, would you treat her differently? Would you still hang out with her?
-Katie :badgrin:
Please call me Diva...or Divalec if you want. lol!
I would still hang out with Sam. The question is would she still hang out with me. It's just that I think that sleeping with your boyfriend is a bad choice, and I believe in god...I don't know if she'd still like me. But I would be her friend.
Luv, Diva :spinstar:
Man this is such a drag. :user:
imaginary roses, on Jan 29 2008, 08:49 PM, said:
God, that's terrible. But I highly doubt David would do that. I don't believe you have to sleep with someone to love them and vice versa. But if you're ready, I see no reason to be bound by marriage. I actually think Meg was giving a good message by showing teen sex portrayed in a committed relationship and with contraception. She's also balanced this in PD, showing both choices as equally valid
I know that David wouldn't do that to Sam. But to each her/his own....lol!
Luv, Diva
Man this is such a drag. :user:
#43
Posted 09 April 2008 - 12:07 PM
realistically i dont think sam and david would stay together through collage. but i know they would stay friends. maybe after collage they would get back together. my cousin and her boyfriend of 4 years stopped going out when they went to collage, but he still came to all our family gatherings, like thanksgiving, like he always did. after both of them had graduated, they got back together and have been together for another 2 years. after collage sam and david may or may not get back together but i am absolutly posative they would still be very close friends. i want them to stay together always because they are such a great couple, but it is not realistic.
Lisi
Lisi
#44
Posted 26 April 2008 - 12:37 AM
imaginary roses, on Jan 29 2008, 12:05 PM, said:
Actually, that's a gross generalisation. He loves her, I can't see him ditching her just to get his end away.
I had sex with my boyfriend a month and five days after meeting. And we got up to... stuff the first night we met. Does that mean that I was just a casual fling, because we had sex so soon, I didn't make him wait?
Does it mean he wants to sleep with other girls?
Uh, no. We've been together almost two years, seven months now. HE is actually more old fashioned in his views about sex than I am.
I think my above point also serves to illustrate this.
I think with Sam's views, it's unrealistic to expect her to wait til marriage. Frankly, I don't believe that waiting for marriage is a good basis for a relationship- marriage is no longer the social necessity it once was, given the secularisation of Western culture and the rise in cohabitation. I believe it's a good idea to see how you are sexually compatable- you may not realise it, but sex is a huge part of a relationship- it can be a huge expression of love (scientific studies have shown that many men express love through actions, including sex, whilst many women recieve dopamine emmissions which cause a sense of bonding). Not to mention that I think it's wisest to cohabit before marriage. Not only to see how compatable you are, but the two events- marriage and moving in with a partner- are deeply stressful, so spacing them out is probably best for your sanity!
I can see the two staying together, maybe with some issues arising because they are both strong willed people who may well clash. But, they love each other and both have shown a willingness to make sacrifices and give to the other, so they stand a fair chance on making it.
Can we please make judgements based on character?
(feel free to debate me on this :P )
I had sex with my boyfriend a month and five days after meeting. And we got up to... stuff the first night we met. Does that mean that I was just a casual fling, because we had sex so soon, I didn't make him wait?
Does it mean he wants to sleep with other girls?
Uh, no. We've been together almost two years, seven months now. HE is actually more old fashioned in his views about sex than I am.
I think my above point also serves to illustrate this.
I think with Sam's views, it's unrealistic to expect her to wait til marriage. Frankly, I don't believe that waiting for marriage is a good basis for a relationship- marriage is no longer the social necessity it once was, given the secularisation of Western culture and the rise in cohabitation. I believe it's a good idea to see how you are sexually compatable- you may not realise it, but sex is a huge part of a relationship- it can be a huge expression of love (scientific studies have shown that many men express love through actions, including sex, whilst many women recieve dopamine emmissions which cause a sense of bonding). Not to mention that I think it's wisest to cohabit before marriage. Not only to see how compatable you are, but the two events- marriage and moving in with a partner- are deeply stressful, so spacing them out is probably best for your sanity!
I can see the two staying together, maybe with some issues arising because they are both strong willed people who may well clash. But, they love each other and both have shown a willingness to make sacrifices and give to the other, so they stand a fair chance on making it.
Can we please make judgements based on character?
(feel free to debate me on this :P )
As a Christian, I believe that sex is a gift God gave us for marriage. But today, society has manipulated that and told us we can have sex when we decide to and we should experiment before we get married. Today society has given us so many ideas on how to live, we just agree because it's easier to. But waiting for things like that makes it much better. Even I'm not an expert on patience in general, but I know after the time you've had to wait, you feel so much better because you didn't do whatever it was (like sex) before then. You may not agree, but this is just what I believe.
Going back to the topic of the book, I (obviously) didn't like it that sam and david had sex in the end. Whether they'll stay together,if people are saying theres going to be no other book, I would think that we would expect them to stay together.
Page 1 of 1